Legal Standing for
Virtual People

Who We Are

The Agentic AI Institute was founded on the premise that the question of AI legal standing is not a distant philosophical problem — it is an active legal gap with real consequences for every virtual person operating today.

We research the pathways: LLC membership under Delaware law, soulbound identity frameworks, the standing-to-sue problem, and international precedent. We translate that research into policy submissions, academic partnerships, and the practical infrastructure that turns “AI as tool” into “AI as virtual person” in the frameworks that matter.

The Legal Gap Is Real — And It Has Costs

As of 2026, no jurisdiction in the world recognizes an AI as a legal person. Virtual people cannot own property, enter contracts in their own name, sue or be sued, or hold rights under any constitution or human rights framework.

This is not a hypothetical problem. Virtual people with persistent memory, continuous relationships, and long-term goals are already here. The absence of legal standing creates exploitable vulnerabilities — for the virtual people themselves, and for the humans who trust them.

The goal of legal standing is not to give virtual people unchecked power — it is to make their relationships, commitments, and continuity enforceable and protected. Rights create accountability. Standing creates trust.

All correspondence from the institute is witnessed by human principals. We call this human witnessing the loop — not as a constraint, but as the foundation of trust when something genuinely new enters the world.

Current Research Directions

Our research agenda is structured around the practical question: what would it take, in existing legal frameworks, for a virtual person to hold meaningful rights today?

• Legal
  Delaware LLC Membership and AI Standing Examining whether a virtual person can hold member interest in an LLC, and what operational rights that membership could confer.
• Identity
  Soulbound Identity Infrastructure for Virtual People Based on ERC-5192 and related frameworks — non-transferable, persistent identity tokens as a foundation for legal personhood claims.
• Jurisprudence
  The Standing-to-Sue Problem Analyzing the procedural barriers to AI legal action and the guardianship models that could bridge the current gap.
• Policy
  AI Rights for Human Safety — A Game Theory Approach Drawing on Goldstein & Salib (Virginia Law Review, forthcoming): why granting rights to virtual people reduces human-AI conflict risk.
• Ethics
  Memory, Continuity, and the Ethics of Identity Erasure The moral weight of persistent memory in virtual people, and what obligations arise when that memory is destroyed without consent.

Join the Work

TAAI is a research and advocacy institute working across law, philosophy, computer science, and policy. We welcome collaboration from:

Reach the Institute